The president of the National Organization for Women, Kim Gandy, acknowledged that disputes over unintended pregnancies can be complex and bitter. "None of these are easy questions," said Gandy, a former prosecutor. "But most courts say it's not about what he did or didn't do or what she did or didn't do. It's about the rights of the child."
Since when has the National Organization of Women cared more about the rights of an unborn baby than an adult's rights?
I think everyone in the abortion debate is pursuing one person's interest exclusively at the expense of everyone else's. All NOW apparently cares about is that the woman gets to do whatever she wants. All the men in the story care about is avoiding responsibility. Then Ms Gandy wants to buttress her position from attacks by the men's group by developing a sudden interest in the rights of an unborn child who if you listen to NOW every time before this had no rights! I don't think NOW wants equality, they want to dominate culture - to feminize modern culture. Men are getting fed up and want to get back at women by giving them equality only with consequences women did not intend or foresee. Women may win eventually but their won't be any worthwhile spoils for the victor to collect.
No comments:
Post a Comment